Presentasjon OTF konferanse 15.11.2006 Vegard Knardal SVP Crewing/QHSE Olympic Shipping AS Den beste operasjonspraksis Olympic Shipping AS ble etablert i 1996 Olympic Supplier Olympic Commander 2 offshore fartøy 1 reketråler Totalt 3 fartøy Markedsverdi ca NOK 120 mill. Olympic Supplier 1984 Olympic Commander 1976 Olympic Prawn 1973 Olympic Prawn
Investeringer i høyteknologi i perioden 1998-2005! Olympic Shipping tilbyr! kompetanse! høyteknologi! avansert teknologiske løsninger! sikkerhet og miljø! Oljeselskapenes utfordring vår framtid Olympic flåten i dag 10 år senere 15 offshore fartøy inkl nybygg 1 reketråler 1 forskningsfartøy Total 17 fartøy der 5 er under bygging på norske verft. Flåteverdi ca NOK 4.0 mrd. Norsk verdensledende design og teknologi
Offshore internasjonale tilstedeværelse: Canada Barents havet Nordsjøen Mexico/USA Middelhavet! Norske offshorerederier har store markedsandeler i den internasjonale offshoreindustrien! Nordsjøen eksporterer høyteknologi og sikkerhetskultur Øst Asia Brazil Vest Afrika Norske sjøfolk mer internasjonale Rapporter knyttet til kran/løft! Ca 20 % av alle rapporter i 2005/2006 er relatert til kran/løft i varierende grad.! Skade på containere! Skade på cargorail! Bruk av personellbasket/arbeidsbasket! Uhåndterlige/korte forløpere! Ønske om forbedret design for rørløfteutstyr! Containerskrev som har slitnet! Mangel på kommunikasjon dekk/bro/kran! Containerdører som har åpnet seg! Løse/Gjenglemte deler/verktøy på containere fra rigg og base! Mottak av pennant ved AH kan skape farlige situasjoner! Dårlig tilgang til dekkskraner! Brukerfeil/mangel på kompetanse! Skade på last ved bruk av dekkskran! Blindløft ved bruk av dekkskran, manglende signalgiver
Incident Incident date: 07.05.2005 Location of Incident: Main deck Description of Incident Time: 07:40:00 Occupation/activities at time of Incident: Transfer av personell In process of a personell basket transfer from the rig to the Olympic Orion the personell basket was landed on deck before the deck crew were in positon to support the operation. The AB`s on deck were busy connecting a pipe for discharging at the aft stack, when the basket was landed on deck in front of the pipe cargo. The rig was also in the middle of a pipe pull. Possible Consequences of Near Miss Personell Injuries Possible injurie to the transferred person as there were no one to control the landing of the personell basket. Deck crew put under pressure to rush two jobs at same time. Preventive action taken by vessel Never allow personell basket transfer before following criteria are in place: 1. Clear communication between Barge bridge, Vessel bridge, Crane and vessel deck crew. All parties reported ready for the operation. 2. Personell transfer not to be done during a pipe pull. Attachments: Incident Incident date: 03.09.2006 Location of Incident: Main Deck Time: 11:30:00 Occupation/activities at time of Incident: Discharging Description of Incident When fastening the loop at the end of the pipe, the bar and strap was swinging. Th AB grabbed the loop but lost balance and was throwed into the pipeend beside and injured his ribs Possible Consequences of Personnel Injuries LTI Occupational injury/illness reported to national authority (RTV) Agent/Consulate notified about hospitalization. Injured person employed by: Olympic Shipping Injured person's name/employee no.: Department: 3 ribs was cracked which leads to 4-6 weeks sick leave. AB had to be replaced at next Port of Call Condition of injured: Pain in side-ribs. General condition good
Konklusjon RUH As we see from this incidents offloading of pipes involves a certain risk. The work floor is uneven and can be slippery. Offloading equipment has big dimensions and it is heavy to handle this manually. The injured AB felt that he was lifted by the crane when grabbing the loop, but is not confirmed by witnesses. Most likely what he felt was uneven move between the vessels, which is natural with the swell condition at the time. There was a change of crane operator at 10.00 AM and the AB stated that the new crane driver was less careful. It is important to take a time out to communicate with the operator and the bridge if you feel that operation is not safe. In addition to the direct causes described above it is important that we challenge the operators to improve the offloading equipment and also look at different ways to stack the pipes to make the handling easier and safer for AB s Incident Incident date: 30.10.2005 Location of Incident: Main Deck Description of Incident Time: 13:23:00 Occupation/activities at time of Incident: Cargo transfer operation During loading alongside Jack up rig the lifting chain on Cutting skip 6-16026 broke. The skip was approx 1,5 m from deck when the break occured Luckely no damage on personell or deck. Possible Consequences of Near Miss Personell Injuries Operational Delay Property Damage Other possible consequence If the chain had broke earlier, when the lift was higher up, major damage could happened. Personnel was well clear, but bits and pieces could had been spread out on deck and hit personell. Most likely major damage on deck, and equipment below deck. Preventive action taken by vessel Ship and vessel crew can not be responsible for these type og occurence. Rig personnel and shore personnel, must make sure that the lifting gear is in 100% in order. Attachments:
Oppfølging fra operatørselskap rselskap! After incident notification form 28/10/05 TOTAL decided to decrease the WLL on the mudskip to 8 MT until further notice. Following action points are agreed;! 78 each chainsling assy s were traced at various locations at this moment, NN will take immediate action to trace the remaining 26 assy s! Required inspection and reporting from Thiele Gmbh.! Show copies of certificates related to quality control! Manufacturing process flowchart incl. quality checkpoints & procedures on corotherm chain and their components! Manufacturing process flowchart incl, quality checkpoints & procedures on corotherm weld type connecting links! Inspection report of the broken link based on the same criteria as on below mentioned Third party inspection requirements.! Independent third party investigation (to be determined at later stage)! Chemical analysis! Pulltest > 25mm! Impact test at range 20 to 20 deg.c! Hardness measurements! Microfoto of fractures! (Broken links to be made available for investigation A.S.A.P) 2006-2008 2008 - satsing innen subsea Fartøy: Kran:! Olympic Orion, MT 6016, conv 2006 150 t, Hydramarine! Olympic Commander, MT 6016 conv 2007 150 t National Oilwell! Olympic TBN, Ulstein P101, okt 2007 150 t Hydramarine! Olympic TBN, Aker ROV02, apr 2008 200 t Hydramarine! Olympic TBN, Ulstein P101, juli 2008 150 t Hydramarine
Utfordringer ved vår v r satsing! Mangel på erfarne kranførere! Bevisstgjøring! Ansvarliggjøring! Kunnskap! Risikoforståelse! Teknisk forståelse! Kommunikasjon/Språk! Kvalitetskontroll på nye kraner etter installasjon Konkrete tiltak! Utarbeidet en løfteoperasjonsmanual som dekker både bruk av offshore og dekkskraner, basert på NORSOK-standard.! Krav at alle dekksfolk skal ha Stroppe/-anhukerkurs ihht OLF uavhengig av fartsområde! Tilfredsstille LOLER krav (UK)! Ansatte på kurs SMS i Trondheim kran-bro-dekk i samarbeid med Statoil! Knytte til oss erfarne kranførere for kvalitetssikring av prosedyrer og opplæring i bruk/risikoforståelse! Kranbrukere på tekniske kurs hos leverandør
Olympic Octopus,, UT712 Safer Deck Operation - Kransystem for sikker dekksoperasjon Innovasjonsprosjekt i samarbeid med Rolls Royce Gir økt sikkerhet, og bedre arbeidsforhold på dekk Gir behov for økt krankompetanse for matroser Setter en ny standard for AH- operasjoner Mer info på www.olympic.no/octopus