EU: e-maritime og Vessels of the future Ørnulf Jan Rødseth Seniorforsker, MARINTEK Maritime Transportsystemer OrnulfJan.Rodseth@marintek.sintef.no Norsk Marinteknisk Forskningsinstitutt
Forskningsstrategier i Europa e-navigation og e-maritime Waterborne TP Vessels of the future Horizon 2020 Hvor går vi fra her?
EU e-maritime komponenter Application Requirements Surveys Safety Security Environment Risk Management National Single Windows Administrations domain Port applications Ship applications Business Domain e-maritime Reference Applications Logistic Chain applications Transport services improvements evaluation 2018? ICT Developments Surveys Communications Surveillance Networks Enabling technologies EU level value adding information services Dynamic Integration to SSN and EU Platforms, e-customs, databases, etc. Interoperability tools Services management Data integration E-Maritime Services Registry Software Engineering tools e-maritime solutions development improvements e-maritime Support Platform 2015? Stakeholder Requirements Surveys Legal Technology Standards and Policies Administration & Business Processes Human Factors Change management Impact Cost Benefit Analysis e-maritime Strategic Framework From joint meeting Short Sea Shipping and Motorways of the Sea Focal Points and Shortsea Promotion Centres presentation by Dimitrios Theologitis, HoU - DG TREN Maritime Transport & Ports Policy; Maritime Security, Brussels, 8 July 2009 2012?
e-maritime vs. e-navigation? e-maritime e-navigation
e-maritime = Maritim ITS = Internasjonale regler og standarder Skip på lange reiser Globalt perspektiv
ITS i forskjellige moder ITS ITS is mainly focused on road 027 ERP gantry by VK35 at en.wikipedia. ERTMS - European Rail Traffic Management System Railway infrastructure at Abererch - geograph.org.uk - 1036602" by OLU. SESAR - Single European Sky ATM Research Melbourne Airport Domestic Terminal1 by Jnpet - Own work. e-navigation/ e-maritime: ITS on sea
Forskjellige domener: Behov for integrasjon Road Rail Air Sea Flere dimensjoner: Trafikk, knutepunkt, logistikk, handel Neppe mulig med en felles datamodell Trenger "semantisk interoperabilitet"
Forskningsstrategier i Europa e-navigation og e-maritime Waterborne TP Vessels of the future Horizon 2020 Hvor går vi fra her?
Samarbeide mellom interesseorganisasjoner
Samarbeide mellom interesseorganisasjoner 2012
Forskningsstrategier I Europa e-navigation og e-maritime Waterborne TP Vessels of the future Horizon 2020 Hvor går vi fra her?
Vessels for the future 55 medlemmer fra 14 EU og EØS stater. Betydelige aktører fra Europa. Målsetning om å bli en "Private Public Partnership" (PPP) med kommisjonen. Sammen med midler fra Horizon 2020 å forvalte ca. 500 MEUR til skipsforskning
Foreslåtte tema for H2020 2016-17 Topic The Energy Efficient Vessel Towards smart, adaptive and multi-material complex vessels The Fuel Flexible Vessel New Destination Cruise Vessel The Safe + Vessel The Smart Vessel Towards Unmanned Vessels and Remote Operations coatings, boundary-layer control devices, air lubrication, wind assisted propulsion smart and adaptive materials and structures for hull structures and outfitting fuel system, engine combustion concepts, exhaust gas treatment systems for multiple fuels aiming at highest fuel efficiency without reduction in reliability and safety. new markets and destinations, for a year-round operation in all climate conditions accident avoidance, damage resilience, better life saving, life-cycle risk management framework big data for improved maintenance and energy management automated and remotely supervised critical ship operations, autonomous ships and systems, regulatory framework
Forskningsstrategier i Europa e-navigation og e-maritime Waterborne TP Vessels of the future Horizon 2020 Hvor går vi fra her?
Horizon 2020 80 billion funding 7 years (2014 to 2020)
Horizon 2020 Også elementer i security, IKT, materialer, produksjonsteknologi, space etc. som er relevant for maritim ITS. Dette er foreløpig utkast og blir endret utover året mot første call i 2016.
Horizon 2020 - Transport 2. WATERBORNE MG-2.1-2017. Innovations for energy efficiency and emission control in waterborne transport MG-2.2-2016. Development, production and use of high performance and lightweight materials for vessels and equipment MG-2.3-2016. New and improved transport concepts in waterborne transport MG-2.4-2017. Complex and value-added specialised vessels
Horizon 2020 - Transport 3. SAFETY MG-3.3-2016. Safer waterborne transport and maritime operations MG-3.4-2016. Transport infrastructure innovation to increase the transport system safety at modal and intermodal level (including nodes and interchanges)
Horizon 2020 - Transport 5. LOGISTICS MG-5.1-2016. Networked and efficient Logistics Clusters MG-5.2-2017. Innovative ICT solutions for future logistics operations MG-5.3-2016. Promoting the deployment of green transport, towards Eco-labels for logistics MG-5.4-2017. Potential of the Physical Internet
Forskningsstrategier I Europa e-navigation og e-maritime Waterborne TP Vessels of the future Horizon 2020 Hvor går vi fra her?
Hvor går vi nå? Aktiviteten i Waterborne blir antagelig overtatt av clusteret "Vessels for the future". Andre prosjekt, for eksempel MESA, bidrar også inn i veikartene. Stor tvil om "Vessels for the future" blir en PPP Horizon 2020 programmet søker innspill fra mange kanter! Mange flere programdeler enn transport Endelig program 2016/17 kommer til høsten en gang
e-maritime og e-navigation i EU Noen store prosjekt, men ledet av myndigheter eller forskningsinstitutt Efficiensea, Mona Lisa, Accseas, emar etc. Avansert trafikkstyring og autonome skip har noe fokus Tilsynelatende lite impact i forhold til satsing!
Foreslått maritim ITS standardisering S-100 Framework e-navigation standards IEC 61162-1 (NMEA 0183) Ship bridge network data model ISO 28005-2 (EPC) Single Window data model ISO 28005-x - Electronic ship certificates
Konklusjoner Demonstratorer er viktig Utvikling av standarder er ennå viktigere Repeterbarhet og åpenhet Offisiell aksept Typegodkjenning og enklere testing Mer vekt på interoperabilitet mellom domener heller enn integrerte datamodeller Vi bør vurdere å henge oss også på EU e-maritime Interessen er der i Kommisjonen Lite konkrete resultater ennå Vilje til integrasjon med e-navigasjon Enklere med regionalt regelverk først?
Takk for oppmerksomheten!