A GLANCE INTO THE FUTURE OF RESEARCH AND EDUCATION Prof. Fredrik Shetelig Dean at Faculty for Architecture and Fine Art NTNU
WHO ARE WE? AND WHAT DO WE DO HERE?
Faculty of Architecture and Fine Art Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology Trondheim Knowledge-cluster on built environment Research Education Innovation Dissemination Foto: Trondheim Kommune Focus on wood
Camera Obscura Master-course in architecture 2006 digital design to fabrication. A gift to the science museum «Vitensenteret» Foto: Trondheim Kommune
Bølgen Workshop run by Architect students initiative StudioBeta Harald Seljesæter, Julie Lundeby Lerfald, Unn Vilde Gilberg, Eirik Strand, Kristoffer Olsen Hauge, Anders Gunleiksrud, Kristian Ormhaug, Suner Syuleyman, Simon Tsuruta Pedersen, Kristin Solhaug Næss, Magnus Nordal Hauken, Lee Bartholomew, Eirik Vist Scheie, Silje Ruud, Andreas Bakken Smedås Sophie Jarzebowski, John Haddal Mork summer2014 In collaboration with Trondheim Municipality «En Blå Tråd» Tresenteret Foto: Trondheim Kommune
Piren Mastercourse self programmed by architect students Anders Gunleiksrud, John Haddal Mork Spring/summer2014 In collaboration with Trondheim Municipality «En Blå Tråd» SINTEF NTNU engineering faculty Tresenteret Snekkeriet på Værdal Foto: Trondheim Kommune
Bryggene (Warehouses) Heritage conservation Numerous mastercourses in architecture & conservation and research projects Centre for Heritage Conservation under development Collaboration: Directorate for Cultural Heritage Sør-Trøndelag County Trondheim Municipality HiST Trondheim Municipality Foto: Trondheim Kommune
ByLAB Framework for collaboration on research, education, innovation and dissemination Wood in the City Urban development Cultural Heritage Art & Culture Education + + NTNU Trondheim Municipality Foto: Trondheim Kommune
First year Full Scale The first semester studying architecture Every year from 2002 Collaboration Trondheim Municipality Tresenteret Foto: Trondheim Kommune
HOW DID WE GET HERE? WOODWISE
Tre Und: 2000-2005 as project 2006 now: Activities has been incorporated in our budgets Funded by Innovasjon Norge, NTNU, Tresenteret, wood & forest industry
Tre Nova 2012/13 WOOD INDUSTRY GATHER STAKEHOLDERS EXCELLENT INTERNATIONAL/NATIONAL COMPETENCE Funded by Innovasjon Norge, NTNU, Tresenteret
Research based centre for Innovation? NTNU, SINTEF, AHO, TreTeknisk, TreFokus, TreSenteret + major comittment from wood & forest industry Application pending 2014 2012 2000
WHY WOOD?
WHY WOOD? Its beautiful and comfortable to the body It is part of our history and identity Its easy to work with, excellent pedagogic material Its basicly local Is it sustainable? We need better calculations and link to Life Cyclus Analysis We need better knowledge on the facts of CO2 acountability We need better local cycles of production and use to reduce transport CO2 16
SORROW OF THE BROKEN HEART (or «bridging the GAP»)
Choosing conventional materials due to uncalculable conceptions of risk Foto: Terje Svaan, Per Knudsen Arkitektkontor AS og Myrseth Arkitektkontor AS 18
Excellent enthusiasts exit the game
«The Chasm» Source: Crossing the Chasm, Geoffrey Moore, 1991/1999
LONESOME NO MORE TEAM UP HOLISTIC COLLABORATION
Team up Many small players in the game Low profit Difficult topography Paper industry out Decreased outtake of the forest. (wood in the bank) Low status of the profession of craftsmen
Holistic model making new knowledge INDUSTRY Ma. education PhD education Innovation Projects STUDY PROGRAMS RESEARCH 24
Holistic model making new knowledge Vocational education INDUSTRY Ma. education PhD education Innovation Projects STUDY PROGRAMS RESEARCH 25
THE POWER OF POLICY AND AMBITIOUS REGULATIONS BASED ON SUSTAINABILITY DEFINITIONS
What if the future campus for NTNU is built in wood? Hilde Bøkestad, head of urban planning, Trondheim Municipality
Policy defining thresholds for CO2 emissions CO2 kg/m²y 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 Produksjon Production and og riving demolition Bundne emisjoner Embodied in materials i materialer Operation Drift Fornybar Renewable Elektrisitets- electricity produksjon production 2.0 0.0 EMISSION ZEB-O EQ ZEB-O ZEB-COM EU: The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive 2010/31/EU (EPBD) Member States shall ensure that by 31 December 2020, all new buildings are nearly zero-energy buildings Alligned with national Governmental White Papers
THE POWER OF PILOTS
Sustainable architecture at NTNU for 100 years 1919-1922: 27 test buildings at NTH campus Measurements of energy loss on different wall envelopes. Result: wooden houses are better and cheaper than brick houses, insulation works well with sawdust, coke gravel and double windows. Andreas Bugge, professor at the architectural department at NTH (NTNU) 1910 29. Powerhouse Brattøra Multicomfort, Larvik Powerhouse Kjørbo Heimdal VGS 2014: 9 committed ZEB pilot buildings by key players in the building industry 2 finished, 1 soon finished, 6 under development ZEB Living Lab, Gløshaugen
Big scale ZEB laboratory - application Facilitating test to breaking point of innovative solutions before applied to PILOT buildings The building envelope, spatial structure and technical infrastructure as laboratory
Videreføring av masteroppgave i arkitektur: Maren Storihle Ødegård Sunniva Huus Nordbø
St.Olavs Hospital
THE POWER OF STUDENTS
www.ntnulivestudio.org
DIY
KEY FACTORS FOR NOW AND THE FUTURE
Policy and regulations Policy on the use of wood as building material in public sector. Building code with performance requirements on LCA and complete CO2 footprint (including embodied emissions, production, transport, montage, use, reuse and demolition) 38
Research and innovation Create a critical mass of new knowledge by research and education strong enough to make breakthroughs Dont spread the engagement all over the place Engage the industry in pilot projects 39
Education Collaborative cross disciplinary educational projects with craftsmen, master students and PhD s Students, students, students: trust the power of the students 40
Whats next? Medium/large urban buildings Frame: Holistic model for knowledge development Threshold condition: political descisions on use of wood Pull: innovative industrial stakeholders aiming for market penetration Push: joint effort on education and research Combination of old & new knowledge 41