PIM ProsjektInformasjonsManual Rapport Tittel: ATFERD OG HÅNDTERING AV TRAFIKKSTANDARDER BEHAVIOUR AND ENFORCEMENT OF TRAFFIC STANDARDS Fordeling: Dato: 3. mars Dok.nr.: Periode: AMS/MS Styret i AMS Arkiv/prosj.nr.: -3 Nr. - Generalforsamling Oppbev.tid: Rev.nr. Verneledere Emneord: Hovedverneombud Trafikk; Standard; Håndheving; Revisjon; Atferd; Godkjent prosjektleder: Godkjent prosjektansvarlig instans: Resymé/konklusjon: R. Guðjónsson E. B. Andresen Revisjon av atferd og håndheving av trafikkstandarder for fabrikkstedene i AMS er gjennomført for alle fabrikkstedene som deltar i prosjektet. Hovedmålet er å forbedre håndhevingen av standarder og regler som hvert fabrikksted har innført og sammenligning av best utførelse ved revisjoner. Deling av best utførelse og erfaring gjennom revisjoner er uvurderlig. Siden dette er det første året i en serie på tre med denne form for revisjoner, er det ikke mulig med sammenligning av tidligere år. Endring av sikkerhetskultur tar tid og innsatsen kan aldri slutte. Revisjonene bidrar til denne endringen og hjelper fabrikkstedene på deres vei til en kultur av samhørighet. Bruk av resultatene ved hver revisjon som muligheter for forbedringer er imidlertid som tidligere fullstendig opp til ledelsen ved hvert fabrikksted. Summary in English The audit of behaviour and enforcement of traffic standards for the member plants of AMS is accomplished for all of the ten member plants that participate in the project. The main objective is to enhance the enforcement of standards and rules set by each plant and benchmarking of best practices by audits. The sharing of best practices from auditors to site and vice versa is invaluable. As this is the first year in series of three with this form of audits, comparison between years is impractical. Changes in safety culture take time and the effort never ends. The audits contribute to this change and help the member sites on their way to culture of interdependent. The usage of the results of each audit as opportunities for improvements is however as before entirely up to the management of each site.
PIM ProsjektInformasjonsManual Rapport Tittel: ATFERD OG HÅNDTERING AV TRAFIKKSTANDARDER BEHAVIOUR AND ENFORCEMENT OF TRAFFIC STANDARDS ÅRSRAPPORT - YEARLY REPORT Innhold Content. Innledning - Introduction. Deltakere - Participants. Bakgrunn - Background.3 Mål - Objectives. Omfang og utvikling - Scope/Process 3. Revisjonsresultater - Findings from audits. Utvikling for ID system - Process for ID systems 5. Konklusjon - Conclusion. INNLEDNING - INTRODUCTION. Deltakere - Participants Revisjon ved - Audits at: Alcoa Fjarðaál Alcoa Lista Hydro Aluminium Høyanger Hydro Aluminium Karmøy Hydro Aluminium Sunndal Hydro Aluminium Årdal Kubikenborg Aluminium Rio Tinto Alcan Island Sør-Norge Aluminium Vigeland Metal Refinery Revisorer fra - Auditors from: Alcoa Fjarðaál Alcoa Lista Hydro Aluminium Høyanger Hydro Aluminium Karmøy Sør-Norge Aluminium Rio Tinto Alcan Island
AMS Steering committee Report Summary The audit of behaviour and enforcement of traffic standards for the member plants of AMS is accomplished for all of the ten member plants that participate in the project. The main objective is to enhance the enforcement of standards and rules set by each plant and benchmarking of best practices by audits. The sharing of best practices from auditors to site and vice versa is invaluable. As this is the first year in series of three with this form of audits, comparison between years is impractical. Changes in safety culture take time and the effort never ends. The audits contribute to this change and help the member sites on their way to culture of interdependent. The usage of the results of each audit as opportunities for improvements is however as before entirely up to the management of each site. Introduction Audits at:. Participants: Hydro Årdal, Alcan Island, Alcoa Fjardaal, Alcoa Lista, Hydro Høyanger, Hydro Karmøy, Hydro Sunndalsøra, Kubal, Søral, Vigeland Auditors from: ISAL, Hydro Høyanger, Alcoa Fjardaal, Hydro Karmøy, Alcoa Lista, Søral. Background The project Vehicles and safety has been ongoing from with changes in design 8. The focus has been on the training of drivers and technical condition of the vehicles and extended with traffic behaviour in 8. A new project was established in to run for three years, called Behaviour and enforcement of traffic standards..3 Objectives a) To enhance the enforcement of standards and rules set by each plant and benchmarking of best practices by audits. b) Improved management and leadership to secure good traffic behaviour through good usage of systems like ID System.
Scope/Process a) Audit of the enforcement of the management system and procedures of each plant regarding vehicles operation, maintenance and pedestrians with respect to the requirements of their parent company. A key question is about what happens on the shop floor and how the first line managers/foremen act on what is happening. The focus is on the following categories of requirements: Vehicle & pedestrian standard Risk assessment 3 Traffic rules Seatbelts 5 Control of maximum speed 6 Lights 7 Pre use inspections 8 Training 9 Scheduled maintenance Segregation Measurements Review b) Sharing of data and cases. Propose and test in at least two plants a process For usage of ID system. Review the process and share learning with all plants through presentation and for interested new plants, allow visits to demonstrate in practice the usage 3 Findings from audits 3. Five types of findings can be made: General comments; How were the auditors received by the audited plant. What was the level of support etc. Major non conformance: The requirement is not implemented. Rules do not exist, rules are not presented to stakeholders or not being enforced by majority of drivers and pedestrians Minor non conformance: The requirement exists and is for the most parts implemented and presented to stakeholders, even if examples of noncompliance were found. Observations: The requirement is fully implemented, but an isolated example of non compliance was found Commendation: The requirement is fully implemented, no examples of noncompliance were found. 3. The General Comments unanimously in all the audit reports are that the auditors have been well received. They have experienced great interest for the audits which is indicated by the participation in the opening and final meetings as well as in the
participation by shop floor workers and leaders in departments. The willingness to learn from the audits and for improvements is measured by the same indications. 3.3 Major non conformance were in total and they are as shown in graph Graph 3. Minor non conformance were in total and they are as shown in graph Graph 5 3 Minor non conformance
3.5 Observations were in total 9 and they are as shown in graph 3 Graph 3 Observations 7 6 5 3 3.6 Commendations were in total 8 and they are as shown in graph Graph Commendations 6 5 3
3.7 In total 73 findings were made in the audits and they are as shown in graph 5 Graph 5 All findings 8 6. Vehicle &. Risk 3. Traffic rules. Seatbelts 5. Control of 6. Lights 7. Preuse 8. Training 9. Scheduled. Segregation.. Review Other Observations Minor non conformance Major non conformance Commendation Process for ID systems Only Alcan Island, Alcoa Fjardaal have implemented ID systems in all or some of their vehicles at this point in time. The opportunity for project leader to visit Alcoa Fjardaal to work on this part of the project has not been found. Still full intention is to work on this as soon as possible. 5 Conclusion 5. Two Benchmarks were identified by auditors. Alcoa Fjardaal for segregation of pedestrians and vehicles The plant at Fjarðaál must in our opinion be a benchmark when it comes to segregation of pedestrians and vehicles. and Hydro Høyanger for Training Excellent planning, material, qualification and competence of trainers as well as execution registration. For the auditors this is a Benchmark 5. In general the most obvious room for improvements for the AMS smelters is in the categories of Segregation, Traffic rules and Pre use inspections. Some sites should as well look into training for improvements. All sites should look at their own audit reports to look for improvement points. 5.3 Training and instructions for auditors need improvements. The presentation of the audit reports is incongruent. Some variation is between auditors on in which category a finding is to be put. More emphasis can be made on bringing forth what could be considered a benchmark from all the commendations in the reports. 5. The General comments of auditors show that the audits were useful for the auditors. They can learn from the plant they are visiting and bring that knowledge home. No comments have been sent to the project leader on the usefulness for the audited plants. More emphasis should be made on receiving responds from the audited plants on that subject. It is my proposition that all audit report should be made available for HSE personnel at the member plants. By this mean we would enhance the learning opportunities. Straumsvík, Iceland, March nd Reynir Guðjónsson