Supporting Information

Like dokumenter
UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Det matematisk-naturvitenskapelige fakultet BIOKJEMISK INSTITUTT

SERK1/2 Acts as a Partner of EMS1 to Control Anther Cell Fate Determination in Arabidopsis

Ringvorlesung Biophysik 2016

Unit Relational Algebra 1 1. Relational Algebra 1. Unit 3.3

MID-TERM EXAM IN TEP4125 THERMODYNAMICS 2 Friday 28 March 2014 Time: 10:30 11:30

NO X -chemistry modeling for coal/biomass CFD

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Model Description. Portfolio Performance

Gradient. Masahiro Yamamoto. last update on February 29, 2012 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

electron geometry (eg) Mother structure of VSEPR molecular geometry (mg) Daughter Structure

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Dynamic Programming Longest Common Subsequence. Class 27

Maple Basics. K. Cooper

Astro Calendar 2001 v 1.03 by Yasuji Yamanaka

Slope-Intercept Formula

Chemical Bonding. The Octet Rule. Lewis Dot Structures. Lewis Dot Structures. Lewis Dot Structures. Lewis Dot Structures 4/9/12

Supplementary Materials for

MID-TERM EXAM TDT4258 MICROCONTROLLER SYSTEM DESIGN. Wednesday 3 th Mars Time:

Astro Calendar 2002 v 1.00 by Yasuji Yamanaka

Astro Calendar '99 v 1.08 by Yasuji Yamanaka

SVM and Complementary Slackness

TDT4117 Information Retrieval - Autumn 2014

Principles of the Delayed Extraction Technique

BEC in microgravity. W. Herr, Institute for Quantum Optics, Leibniz University of Hanover

Figure S1. Figure S2.

FYSMEK1110 Eksamensverksted 23. Mai :15-18:00 Oppgave 1 (maks. 45 minutt)

Trigonometric Substitution

Ole Isak Eira Masters student Arctic agriculture and environmental management. University of Tromsø Sami University College

GEF2200 Atmosfærefysikk 2017

The building blocks of a biogas strategy

Stationary Phase Monte Carlo Methods

Supplemental Information

Oppgave 1a Definer følgende begreper: Nøkkel, supernøkkel og funksjonell avhengighet.

1 BANESTRØMFORSYNING TOGVARMEANLEGG KONTAKTLEDNINGSANLEGG... 5

Appendix C. ClustalW alignments and. Blast search results

Revegetering av steintipper i høgfjellet

Electronic supplementary material. Bis(alkyl) rare-earth complexes coordinated by bulky tridentate

2A September 23, 2005 SPECIAL SECTION TO IN BUSINESS LAS VEGAS

1. Explain the language model, what are the weaknesses and strengths of this model?

Moving Objects. We need to move our objects in 3D space.

SRP s 4th Nordic Awards Methodology 2018

PETROLEUMSPRISRÅDET. NORM PRICE FOR ALVHEIM AND NORNE CRUDE OIL PRODUCED ON THE NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL SHELF 1st QUARTER 2016

Estimating Peer Similarity using. Yuval Shavitt, Ela Weinsberg, Udi Weinsberg Tel-Aviv University

Neuroscience. Kristiansand

EN Skriving for kommunikasjon og tenkning

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

1 Øvelse Dynamic Mercy 1 Exercise Dynamic Mercy

BPS TESTING REPORT. December, 2009

Energy Calibration for the Forward Detector at WASA-at-COSY

Dean Zollman, Kansas State University Mojgan Matloob-Haghanikar, Winona State University Sytil Murphy, Shepherd University

Kurskategori 2: Læring og undervisning i et IKT-miljø. vår

Eksamen i TFY4230 STATISTISK FYSIKK Onsdag 21. desember, :00 19:00

Molecular modeling of different substrate-binding modes and their role in penicillin acylase catalysis

Tor Haakon Bakken. SINTEF Energi og NTNU

Exam in Quantum Mechanics (phys201), 2010, Allowed: Calculator, standard formula book and up to 5 pages of own handwritten notes.

Referansearkitektur use cases. Kjell Sand SINTEF Energi AS NTNU Institutt for elkraftteknikk

5 E Lesson: Solving Monohybrid Punnett Squares with Coding

SENSORS. HAIN An Integrated Acoustic Positioning and Inertial Navigation System

INNOVASJONSTOGET GÅR. - hvor er legene?

Polyvalent vaccines for optimal coverage of potential T-cell epitopes in global HIV-1 variants

Satellite Stereo Imagery. Synthetic Aperture Radar. Johnson et al., Geosphere (2014)

EKSAMENSOPPGAVE I FAG TKP 4105

Andrew Gendreau, Olga Rosenbaum, Anthony Taylor, Kenneth Wong, Karl Dusen

TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE NORWEGIAN PRIMARY ALUMINUM INDUSTRY

FYS 3710 Biofysikk og Medisinsk Fysikk, DNA, RNA, Translasjon, Transkripsjon Proteinsyntese, Cellesyklus

Trenger vi nye kostholdsråd? (ja)

Second Order ODE's (2P) Young Won Lim 7/1/14

Produksjonsresponser og økonomi ved bruk av surfôr med svært høg kvalitet i kjøttproduksjon på storfe

SERVICE BULLETINE

Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Biodevices

Right Triangle Trigonometry

Horisont 2020 EUs forsknings- og innovasjonsprogram. Brussel, 6. oktober 2014 Yngve Foss, leder, Forskningsrådets Brusselkontor

Numerical Simulation of Shock Waves and Nonlinear PDE

Start MATLAB. Start NUnet Applications Statistical and Computational packages MATLAB Release 13 MATLAB 6.5

Accuracy of Alternative Baseline Methods

Right Triangle Trigonometry

TFY4170 Fysikk 2 Justin Wells

Kalibrering. Hvordan sikrer Norsonic sporbarhet av måleresultatene. Ole-Herman Bjor

- VEDLEGG N. Skilting for bevegelseshemmede

Chemical Concept Inventory

Exercise 1: Phase Splitter DC Operation

Neural Network. Sensors Sorter

SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON THE DECREASING SCALE ELASTICITY

EKSAMENSOPPGAVE I BI3013 EKSPERIMENTELL CELLEBIOLOGI

Monitoring water sources.

Examination paper for (BI 2015) (Molekylærbiologi, laboratoriekurs)

Lattice Simulations of Preheating. Gary Felder KITP February 2008

Databases 1. Extended Relational Algebra

Ma Flerdimensjonal Analyse Øving 1

Presisjonsseismologi: Nøyaktig lokalisering av Nord-Koreas prøvesprengninger

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Salting of dry-cured ham

Tips for bruk av BVAS og VDI i oppfølging av pasienter med vaskulitt. Wenche Koldingsnes

Erfaringer fra en monografi-arbeidsgruppe

Splitting the differential Riccati equation

Sterk global konkurranse, raske teknologiskift og det grønne skiftet utfordrer dagens løsninger og produksjonsmetoder.

MOL204 Anvendt bioinformatikk I

Et treårig Interreg-prosjekt som skal bidra til økt bruk av fornybare drivstoff til persontransporten. greendriveregion.com

melting ECMI Modelling week 2008 Modelling and simulation of ice/snow melting Sabrina Wandl - University of Linz Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen - Tampere UT

Information search for the research protocol in IIC/IID

Transkript:

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Molecular BioSystems. This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Supporting Information Molecular simulations studies on the binding selectivity of 2-anilino-4-(thiazol-5-yl)- pyrimidines in complexes with CDK2 and CDK7 Tahir Ali Chohan, Hai-Yan Qian, You-Lu Pan, and Jian-Zhong Chen* College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China * Corresponding Author:email: chjz@zju.edu.cn (J.-Z. Chen)

Table S1. Surflex score of docked ligand CP1 for CDK2 and CP1-3 for CDK7 Docking complex ΔG exp CScore a Crash score b Polar G score d PMF D score f Chem score c score e score g Amino acid interaction CDK2-CP1-13.66 7.20-1.02 1.89-249.57-62.04-150.91-29.01 Leu83, Lys89, Asp86 CDK7-CP1-8.27 4.49-1.02 2.15-136.05-43.39-108.54-24.65 Met94 CDK7-CP2-9.79 5.41-1.10 1.68-200.73-24.64-200.73-34.87 Met94 CDK7-CP3-11.85 5.55-0.47 1.82-110.04-66.02-193.54-25.25 Met94 a CScore is a consensus scoring which uses multiple types of scoring functions to rank the affinity of ligands, b Crashscore revealing the inappropriate penetration into the binding site, c Polar region of the ligand, d G-score showing hydrogen bonding, complex (ligand-protein), and internal (ligand-ligand) energies, e PMF-score indicating the Helmholtz free energies of interactions for protein-ligand atom pairs (Potential of Mean Force, PMF), f D-score for charge and van der Waals interactions between the protein and the ligand, g Chem-score points for hydrogen bonding, lipophilic contact, and rotational entropy, along with an intercept term. Figure S1. Comparison of binding modes of docked ligand with their starting conformations. (A) Superimposition of the docked ligand CP1 (Purple) and experimental conformation of CDK2 (Cyan). (B) Superimposition of the docked ligand CP1 (Purple) and experimental conformation of CP3 in the active site of CDK2 (Cyan). (C) Alignment of docked compounds CP1 (Purple), CP2 (Green) and CP3 (Cyan) within the active site of CDK7. The main residues constituting the active site are identified with a three letter representation. (D) The average means RMSD using bars chat.

CDK1 ---------MEDYTKIEKIGEGTYGVVYKGRHKTTGQVVAMKKIRLESE---EEGVPSTA 48 CDK2 ---------MENFQKVEKIGEGTYGVVYKARNKLTGEVVALKKIRLDTE---TEGVPSTA 48 CDK3 FCFPGSSVAMDMFQKVEKIGEGTYGVVYKAKNRETGQLVALKKIRLDLE---MEGVPSTA 57 CDK4 -------MATSRYEPVAEIGVGAYGTVYKARDPHSGHFVALKSVRVPNGGGGGGGLPIST 53 CDK7 -MALDVKSRAKRYEKLDFLGEGQFATVYKARDKNTNQIVAIKKIKLGHRSEAKDGINRTA 59. : : :* * :..***.:. :..**:*.::: *: :: CDK1 IREISLLKE---LRHPNIVSLQDVLMQ-----DSRLYLIFEFLSMDLKKYLDSIPPGQYM 100 CDK2 IREISLLKE---LNHPNIVKLLDVIHT-----ENKLYLVFEFLHQDLKKFMDASA-LTGI 99 CDK3 IREISLLKE---LKHPNIVRLLDVVHN-----ERKLYLVFEFLSQDLKKYMDSTP-GSEL 108 CDK4 VREVALLRRLEAFEHPNVVRLMDVCATSRTDREIKVTLVFEHVDQDLRTYLDKAP-PPGL 112 CDK7 LREIKLLQE---LSHPNIIGLLDAFGH-----KSNISLVFDFMETDLEVIIKDNS--LVL 109 :**: **:. : ***:: * *...: *:*:.: **. :. : CDK1 DSSLVKSYLYQILQGIVFCHSRRVLHRDLKPQNLLIDDKGTIKLADFGLARAFGIPIRVY 160 CDK2 PLPLIKSYLFQLLQGLAFCHSHRVLHRDLKPQNLLINTEGAIKLADFGLARAFGVPVRTY 159 CDK3 PLHLIKSYLFQLLQGVSFCHSHRVIHRDLKPQNLLINELGAIKLADFGLARAFGVPLRTY 168 CDK4 PAETIKDLMRQFLRGLDFLHANCIVHRDLKPENILVTSGGTVKLADFGLARIYSYQM-AL 171 CDK7 TPSHIKAYMLMTLQGLEYLHQHWILHRDLKPNNLLLDENGVLKLADFGLAKSFGSPNRAY 169 :* : *:*: : *. ::******:*:*: *.:********: :.. CDK1 THEVVTLWYRSPEVLLGSARYSTPVDIWSIGTIFAELATKKPLFHGDSEIDQLFRIFRAL 220 CDK2 THEVVTLWYRAPEILLGSKYYSTAVDIWSLGCIFAEMVTRRALFPGDSEIDQLFRIFRTL 219 CDK3 THEVVTLWYRAPEILLGSKFYTTAVDIWSIGCIFAEMVTRKALFPGDSEIDQLFRIFRML 228 CDK4 TPVVVTLWYRAPEVLLQS-TYATPVDMWSVGCIFAEMFRRKPLFCGNSEADQLGKIFDLI 230 CDK7 THQVVTRWYRAPELLFGARMYGVGVDMWAVGCILAELLLRVPFLPGDSDLDQLTRIFETL 229 * *** ***:**:*: : *. **:*::* *:**: : :: *:*: *** :** : CDK1 GTPNNEVWPEVESLQDYKNTFPKWKPGSLASHVKNLDENGLDLLSKMLIYDPAKRISGKM 280 CDK2 GTPDEVVWPGVTSMPDYKPSFPKWARQDFSKVVPPLDEDGRSLLSQMLHYDPNKRISAKA 279 CDK3 GTPSEDTWPGVTQLPDYKGSFPKWTRKGLEEIVPNLEPEGRDLLMQLLQYDPSQRITAKT 288 CDK4 GLPPEDDWPRDVSLPR--GAFPPRGPRPVQSVVPEMEESGAQLLLEMLTFNPHKRISAFR 288 CDK7 GTPTEEQWPDMCSLPDYVT-FKSFPGIPLHHIFSAAGDDLLDLIQGLFLFNPCARITATQ 288 * * : **.: *....*: :: ::* **:. CDK1 ALNHPYFNDLDNQIKKM----------------------------------------- 297 CDK2 ALAHPFFQDVTKPVPHLRL--------------------------------------- 298 CDK3 ALAHPYFSSPE-PSPAARQYVLQR----FRH--------------------------- 314 CDK4 ALQHSYLHKDEGNPE------------------------------------------- 303 CDK7 ALKMKYFSNRPGPTPGCQLPRPNCPVETLKEQSNPALAIKRKRTEALEQGGLPKKLIF 347 Figure S2. The sequence alignments of CDK1, CDK2, CDK3, CDK4 and CDK7 generated by Clustal W. at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/tools/msa/clustalw2/. In the sequences, an asterisk (*) indicates an identical or conserved residue; a colon (:) indicates conserved substitutions; a stop (.) indicates semi-conserved substitutions.

Table S2. Result of binding site comparison of CDK2 and CDK7, based on EasyMIFs using CMET probes. Rank Total energy (kcal mol -1 ) Volume (Å) Residues contributing to each cluster (identified by subsite) CDK2 CDK7 CDK2 CDK7 CDK2 CDK7 1-1622.97-955.83 123 75 I10, G11, G13, V18, K33, V64, F80, Q131, N132, A144, E20, T96, D97, E99, V100, K139, P140, N141 D145 2-797.57-841.43 66 57 E8, K9, I10, G11, K20, F82, H84 L18, K41, F91, D92, F93, M94, E95, T96, D97, L144, A154, D155 3-125.81-561.12 8 50 I10, E81, F82, L83, A31, L134 F93, E95, T96, E147 Table S3. Quantum chemical descriptors based upon DFT calculations used for MESP for compounds CP1, CP2, and CP3. Quantum descriptors Gas phase Solvent phase (Aqueous) CP1 CP2 CP3 CP1 CP2 CP3 E LUMO (ev) -0.080-0.105-0.065-0.071-0.117-0.067 E HOMO (ev) -0.222-0.215-0.190-0.217-0.215-0.188 Total dipole moment µ (D) 11.52 4.41 5.19 15.75 5.85 6.85 Figure S3. Molecular orbital for the HOMO LUMO plot of (A) CP1, (B) CP2, and (C) CP3 with B3LYP/6-31G (d,p)

Figure S4. (A) The distance of CDK2-Asp145 (OD1) and CDK7-Asp155 (OD1) from C27 atom of inhibitor CP1, plotted as a function of time in CDK2-CP1 and CDK7-CP1. (B) The distance of CDK2-Asp86 (OD1) and CDK7-Asp97 (OD1) from N 17 atom of inhibitor CP2, plotted as a function of time in CDK2-CP2 and CDK7- CP2. (C) The distance of CDK2-Asp86 (CB) and CDK7-Asp97 (CB) from N 6 atom of inhibitor CP3, plotted as a function of time in CDK2-CP3 and CDK7-CP3.

Table S4. Hydrogen bonds analyses from MD trajectories a System Donor a Acceptor a Occupancy(%) b Distance(Å) c Angle( o ) d CDK2-CP1 Leu83 N-H CP1 N1 98.48 3.003 ± 0.12 24.90 ± 13.12 CP1 N1-H9 Leu83 O 73.16 2.999 ± 0.17 27.15 ± 8.12 Lys89 NZ-HZ3 CP1 O2 41.69 3.234 ± 0.45 33.05 ± 15.12 Lys89 NZ-HZ2 CP1 O2 31.69 3.202 ± 0.60 33.53 ± 14.87 CDK7-CP1 CP1 N1-H9 MET94 O 99.97 2.952 ± 0.15 23.29 ± 10.12 Met94 N-H CP1 N1 99.28 3.064 ± 0.14 32.19 ± 14.55 Lys44 NZ-HZ2 CP1 O3 36.00 2.87 ± 0.70 154.31 ± 14.73 CDK2- CP2 CP2 N7-H8 Leu83 O 99.81 3.001 ± 0.16 21.96 ± 11.08 Leu83 N-H CP2 N1 97.83 3.099 ± 0.15 29.01 ± 13.13 CP2 N7A-H5 Asp145 OD1 46.28 3.011 ± 0.28 21.36 ± 11.00 CP2 N7A-H4 Asp145 OD2 40.40 3.454 ± 0.59 32.67 ± 14.69 Lys89 NZ-HZ2 CP2 O8B 12.80 3.498 ± 0.78 34.19 ± 14.49 CDK7- CP2 CP2 N7-H8 Met94 O 99.30 2.961 ± 0.15 19.31 ± 11.30 Met94 N-H CP2 N1 98.37 3.106 ± 0.15 28.58 ± 12.97 CP2 N7A-H4 Asp155 OD2 30.59 3.241 ± 0.75 27.72 ± 15.58 CP2 N7A-H4 Asp155 OD1 28.21 4.142 ± 0.72 37.56 ± 13.74 CDK2-CP3 CP3 N7-H6 Leu83 O 100 3.026 ± 0.16 27.77 ± 13.07 Leu83 N-H CP3 N1 99.80 3.054 ± 0.13 21.74 ± 10.26 CDK7- CP3 CP3 N7-H6 Leu83 O 99.94 3.038 ± 0.21 19.55 ± 10.12 MET94 N-H CP3 N1 99.51 3.023 ± 0.13 31.79 ± 13.87 Q85T- CP1 Leu83 N-H CP1 N1 85.90 3.090 ± 0.16 21.70 ± 9.69 K89L- CP1 Leu83 N-H CP1 N1 82.97 3.123 ± 0.16 21.65 ± 9.79 CP1 N8-H Glu228 O 100 2.63 ± 0.11 158.97 ± 9.88 CP1 N16-H Asp292 OD2 30.00 4.31 ± 0.43 144.23 ± 13.75 D145A- CP1 Leu83 N-H CP1 N1 79.69 3.167 ± 0.19 21.65 ± 9.79 a The listed donor and acceptor pairs satisfy the criteria for the hydrogen bond over 30.0% of the time during the 40 ns of simulation. b Occupancy is in unit of percentage of the investigated time period. c The average distance with standard error (SE = standard deviation/n1/2) between hydrogen acceptor atom and proton on hydrogen donor atom in the investigated time period. d The average angle with standard error (SE = standard deviation/n1/2) in parentheses for hydrogen bond in the investigated time period.