Mercury hemispheric modelling: EMEP experience

Like dokumenter
NO X -chemistry modeling for coal/biomass CFD

Satellite Data for Marine Climate Monitoring Purposes

1 Atle Harby, CEDREN

Strategy for the Northern Areas Development of R&D and Forecasting

Forskerseminar Havet og kysten PROOFNY & OLF. Toril Røe Utvik Einar Lystad

Software applications developed for the maritime service at the Danish Meteorological Institute

Method validation for NO (10 ppm to 1000 ppm) in nitrogen using the Fischer Rosemount chemiluminescence analyser NOMPUMELELO LESHABANE

Mot et grønnere europeisk energimarked: Hovedeffekter i energimarkedene av Paris-avtalen CICEP CREE modellseminar 28 april 2016 Rolf Golombek

melting ECMI Modelling week 2008 Modelling and simulation of ice/snow melting Sabrina Wandl - University of Linz Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen - Tampere UT

Hva skal vi dimensjonere rør og flomveier for i fremtiden og hvordan gjør vi det

Generalization of age-structured models in theory and practice

Csilla Farkas Johannes Deelstra Per Stålnacke

HONSEL process monitoring

Simon Fraser University

Welcome to GEF2210. Course content

INTPART. INTPART-Conference Survey 2018, Key Results. Torill Iversen Wanvik

Ett rent hav vår framtid

Kreft forekomst, overlevelse/prognose og screening for kreft blant innvandrere. Giske Ursin Direktør Kreftregisteret

SRP s 4th Nordic Awards Methodology 2018

CO oxidation mechanism (low NO x ) CO oxidation mechanism (high NO x )

GeoForum sin visjon: «Veiviser til geomatikk» og virksomhetsideen er: «GeoForumer en uavhengig interesseorganisasjon for synliggjøring og utvikling

Hva er lite, noe og mye luftforurensning?

IPCC, From emissions to climate change

SIAEOS status og videre arbeid. Karin Refsnes prosjektdirektør, Norges forskningsråd, SIAEOS seminar

Aerosols Why are we interested in them?

Gruppe 5: Klimamodellering og analyse. Nils Gunnar Kvamstø David B. Stephenson

Prognoses for future acidification recovery of water, soils and forests:

Effektstudien Oppfølging i 2009? Kort presentasjon (1) DØ,

Dok.dato: Klassering: Dok.dato: Klassering: Dok.dato: Klassering:

Kjell Arne Mork, Francisco Rey, Henrik Søiland

Klima i Norge 2100 Kunnskapsgrunnlag for klimatilpassing

L+T Data Processing and its Special Features

Nasjonalt kvalifikasjonsrammeverk og læringsmål i forskerutdanningen

CAMO GRUPPEN. Restrukturering av eierskap, drift og finansiering. Sverre Stange 15 JUNI 2005

Assessment of Urban Forestry Research in the Nordic and Baltic countries. Project Description Form

MÅLING OG VURDERING AV TEKSTUR I VEGOVERFLATER OG KOPLING TIL STØY

SFI-Norman presents Lean Product Development (LPD) adapted to Norwegian companies in a model consisting of six main components.

Mobility Analytics. Klyngesamlinga Arena Lønnsomme Vinteropplevelser Natanja Weist Forretningsutvikling Telenor Norway

Forskningsinfrastruktur på Svalbard - hvorfor er det viktig?

Aerosols Why are we interested in them?

CasNr: Tester. 96h LC50 6, h LC50 0, d NOEC 0, d NOEC 0,001 Onchorhynchus mykiss 1

Fra ord til handling Industrien som forskningsaktør

Marsh Loss and Tidal Habitat Degradation

Satellite Stereo Imagery. Synthetic Aperture Radar. Johnson et al., Geosphere (2014)

SeaWalk No 1 i Skjolden

Klimaendringer og klimarisiko. Borgar Aamaas For Naturviterne 10. november 2016

Deposition of major inorganic compounds in Norway

Kostnader og kostnadsoverskridelser i norske vegprosjekt

FREMTIDENS ETTERSPØRSEL ETTER BIOMASSE

Eksamensoppgave i PSY3100 Forskningsmetode - Kvantitativ

IEA PVPS. Trond Moengen. Global co-operation towards sustainable deployment of photovoltaic power systems

COUNTRY REPORT- NORWAY

Finanskrisen i Nato Budsjettkutt og ressursmangel

European supply and demand for Cod and Haddock

EFPIA Disclosure Code - Kort introduksjon og spørsmål til implementering

Dean Zollman, Kansas State University Mojgan Matloob-Haghanikar, Winona State University Sytil Murphy, Shepherd University

The Future of Academic Libraries the Road Ahead. Roy Gundersen

Vurdering av dagens og fremtidig nitrogenlekkasje i Norge

OECD GUIDELINE FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS

Polluted sediments in Bjørvika the submerged tunnel project

Jordsystemmodellering muligheter og usikkerheter

VLSI Design for Yield on Chip Level

Optimale pådriv for endringer i hyppigheten av atmosfæriske strømningsmønstre, spesielt COWL

By Bioforsk SEALINK Team

GeWare: A data warehouse for gene expression analysis

Aerosols Why are we interested in them?

Salting of dry-cured ham

RESULTAT FRA IN VITRO TESTING AV LAKSELUS FØLSOMHET FOR AQUI-S

Klimascenarier og effekter for snøforhold i Norge i framtiden

Forskning og teknologi innen CO 2 håndtering

96h NOEC 1800 Scendesmus subspicatus 1. 96h LC Onchorhynchus mykiss 1. AMF basert på PNEC1 Laveste L(EC)50 0, ,021

Hvordan kan akademia styrke norsk oljevernberedskap? Kenneth Ruud Prorektor forskning og utvikling

Statistiske oppgaver over selvmord i Norge, Norden og de baltiske land. Suicide statistics in Norway, the Nordic and the Baltic countries

Hvordan kan Europas energirevolusjon påvirke nordisk og norsk skogsektor?

Algevekst innvirkning av klima, næringsstoffer og lys et langtiddstudie fra en landbrukspåvirket innsjø ( )

Public roadmap for information management, governance and exchange SINTEF

Marmi Plus One. Sleek, Essential, Stunning

Q2 Results July 17, Hans Stråberg President and CEO. Fredrik Rystedt CFO

EU Energi, SET-plan. Beate Kristiansen, Spesialrådgiver/EU NCP Energi

Karbonholdige partikler Naturlige eller menneskeskapte?

In honour of Thor Heyerdahl bridge builder, challenger and boundary breaker

CTGA Meeting February 2, 2012

Dok.dato: Dok.dato:

Sascha Schubert Product Manager Data Mining SAS International Copyright 2006, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved.

Hva slags AAR-krav i framtida? Begrunnelse for Felt/Lab Performance. COIN fagdag 20. mai 2008 Terje F. Rønning, Norcem AS

40 år med overvåking av nedbørkjemi i Norge for studier av bl.a forsuring og overgjødsling

ISO 41001:2018 «Den nye læreboka for FM» Pro-FM. Norsk tittel: Fasilitetsstyring (FM) - Ledelsessystemer - Krav og brukerveiledning

The building blocks of a biogas strategy

(12) Translation of European patent specification

Kort om Smart Produksjon sammenligning LEAN. Frode Brakstad Seminar PROSIN - konferansen 16 august 2012, Fevik

Sterk global konkurranse, raske teknologiskift og det grønne skiftet utfordrer dagens løsninger og produksjonsmetoder.

By Bioforsk SEALINK Team

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO ØKONOMISK INSTITUTT

Company Presentation. (sfi) 2 karrieredag. 31 October Knut T. Smerud Founder, Chairman and CEO SMERUD MEDICAL RESEARCH GROUP

What's in IT for me? Sted CAMPUS HELGELAND, MO I RANA Tid

2012 NattoPharma ASA

Deposition of major inorganic compounds in Norway and : status and trends

Oppgave. føden)? i tråd med

Péter Bakonyi VITUKI

Offentlig journal. Blir ikke tinglyst da det mangler opplysninger i dokumentet. Asker kommune - Asker automatstasjon 2012/ /

Transkript:

Mercury hemispheric modelling: EMEP experience Oleg Travnikov EMEP/

Outline Processes affecting the intercontinental transport and deposition of Hg Long-term monitoring of Hg Hemispheric Hg modelling within EMEP Evaluation of model uncertainty

What are the pathways of Hg intercontinental transport? GEM vertical profiles in the Arctic (Banic et al., 23) Hg 8 Hg HgII Oxidation Hg HgII HgII HgII Hg 7 6 5 Hg HgII Altitude (km) 4 3 Continent A Continent B 2 1

Major atmospheric processes Anthropogenic and natural emissions

Anthropogenic emissions of Hg (199, 1995, 2) CGEIC website www.ortech.ca/cgeic/ AMAP website www.amap amap.no/resources/hgemissions Natural emissions of Hg E estimates EMEP/ E Report 6/22 Re-emission emission of Hg Assimilation of observations Multi-compartment modelling Hg emissions

Major atmospheric processes Anthropogenic and natural emissions Gas-phase and aqueousphase chemistry

Major uncertainties: Atmospheric chemistry Uncertainty of the reaction constants Chemical transformations of Hg (Lin et al., 26) Reaction Rate Gas-phase reactions cm 3 molec -1 s -1 Hg + O HgO + O2 Hg products Hg ( 3( ( s, ( g + ( ) OH( + + H O ( 2 2( + products + Cl2( + Br2( + Cl( + Br( (3 49) 1-2 (8.7 9) 1-14 8.9 1-19 2.6 1-18 < 9 1-17 (7.6 1) 1-13 3.2 1-12 + BrO( (1 1) 1-15 Aqueous-phase reactions aq ) + O3 ( Hg aq + OH aq Hg ( ) ( ) ( + HOCl( + Cl + OH + OCl( + Cl + OH + HOBr( + Br + OH M -1 s -1 4.7 1 7 2. 1 9 2.9 1 6 1.99 1 6.279 + OBr( + Br + OH + Br2( + 2Br HgSO ( aq ) Hg 3 ( + S( VI) 2 SO3) 2( aq ) + S( VI).273.196 Texp(31.971T-12595)/T s -1 << 1-4 s -1 OH) 2 ( aq ) + UV 3 1-7 s -1 II + HO Hg products 1.7 1 4 s -1 ) ( aq ) 2 ( aq ) + ) ( aq

Major uncertainties: Atmospheric chemistry Uncertainty of the reaction constants Unknown products of the reactions. What is RGM? Chemical transformations of Hg (Lin et al., 26) Reaction Rate Gas-phase reactions cm 3 molec -1 s -1 Hg + O HgO + O2 Hg products Hg ( 3( ( s, ( g + ( ) OH( + + H O ( 2 2( + products + Cl2( + Br2( + Cl( + Br( (3 49) 1-2 (8.7 9) 1-14 8.9 1-19 2.6 1-18 < 9 1-17 (7.6 1) 1-13 3.2 1-12 + BrO( (1 1) 1-15 Aqueous-phase reactions aq ) + O3 ( Hg aq + OH aq Hg ( ) ( ) ( + HOCl( + Cl + OH + OCl( + Cl + OH + HOBr( + Br + OH M -1 s -1 4.7 1 7 2. 1 9 2.9 1 6 1.99 1 6.279 + OBr( + Br + OH + Br2( + 2Br HgSO ( aq ) Hg 3 ( + S( VI) 2 SO3) 2( aq ) + S( VI).273.196 Texp(31.971T-12595)/T s -1 << 1-4 s -1 OH) 2 ( aq ) + UV 3 1-7 s -1 II + HO Hg products 1.7 1 4 s -1 ) ( aq ) 2 ( aq ) + ) ( aq

Major uncertainties: Atmospheric chemistry Uncertainty of the reaction constants Unknown products of the reactions. What is RGM? Unknown role of aqueous sorption by insoluble particles Chemical transformations of Hg (Lin et al., 26) Reaction Rate Gas-phase reactions cm 3 molec -1 s -1 Hg + O HgO + O2 Hg products Hg ( 3( ( s, ( g + ( ) OH( + + H O ( 2 2( + products + Cl2( + Br2( + Cl( + Br( (3 49) 1-2 (8.7 9) 1-14 8.9 1-19 2.6 1-18 < 9 1-17 (7.6 1) 1-13 3.2 1-12 + BrO( (1 1) 1-15 Aqueous-phase reactions aq ) + O3 ( Hg aq + OH aq Hg ( ) ( ) ( + HOCl( + Cl + OH + OCl( + Cl + OH + HOBr( + Br + OH M -1 s -1 4.7 1 7 2. 1 9 2.9 1 6 1.99 1 6.279 + OBr( + Br + OH + Br2( + 2Br HgSO ( aq ) Hg 3 ( + S( VI) 2 SO3) 2( aq ) + S( VI).273.196 Texp(31.971T-12595)/T s -1 << 1-4 s -1 OH) 2 ( aq ) + UV 3 1-7 s -1 II + HO Hg products 1.7 1 4 s -1 ) ( aq ) 2 ( aq ) + ) ( aq

Major atmospheric processes Anthropogenic and natural emissions Gas-phase and aqueousphase chemistry Wet and dry depositions

Deposition processes Hg emissions GEM RGM+TPM Peculiarities of Hg removal: Close connection with emissions speciation and atmospheric chemistry Dry deposition of Hg Hg depositions to forest (accumulation in foliage) from GEM emissions Hg depositions from RGM and TPM emissions

Deposition processes Peculiarities of Hg removal: Close connection with emissions speciation and atmospheric chemistry Dry deposition of Hg Hg depositions to forest (accumulation in foliage) Hg deposition, μg/m 2 /y Modelled vs. measured Hg deposition to forest (Munthe et al., 25) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Steinkreuz, Steinkreuz, DE DE Lehstenbach, Lehstenbach, DE DE Urani, Urani, FI FI Svartberget, Svartberget, FI FI Throughfall Litterfall Throughfall Model

Major atmospheric processes Anthropogenic and natural emissions Gas-phase and aqueousphase chemistry Wet and dry depositions Air-surface exchange

Long-term monitoring of Hg Hg monitoring sites in the Northern Hemisphere Lista, Norway (199-23) 4 Hg concentration in precipitation, ng/l 3 2 1 ` 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 - air concentration - wet deposition - air conc. & wet deposition Measuring Hg parameters Air conc. Wet Dry EMEP GEM, HgP + NADP/MDN + CAMNet GEM +

EMEP mercury transport models Hemispheric model (MSCE-HM-Hem) Coverage Northern Hemisphere Resolution 2.5 2.5 One-way nesting EMEP region Regional model (MSCE-HM) Coverage EMEP region Resolution 5 5 km 2

Hg intercontinental transport Contribution of non-european sources to Hg depositions in the NH Hg deposition to Germany Global sources 24% Germany 49% Natural (Europe) 1% Others 8% Belgium 3% Netherlands 7% France 8% EMEP region Hg deposition to the UK Global sources 6% Natural (Europe) 1% Others 3% Netherlands 1% France 2% 25-6% of Hg depositions in Europe comes from global sources Germany 4% UK 29%

Hg intercontinental transport Hg deposition in Europe Total annual Hg deposition in the Northern Hemisphere Total Hg deposition, t/y 12 1 8 6 4 2 61% 15% 5% Natural Anthropogenic 3% 12% 4% Europe Asia North America Africa Oceans South. Hem.

Hg intercontinental transport Hg deposition in North America Total annual Hg deposition in the Northern Hemisphere Total Hg deposition, t/y 8 6 4 2 14% 24% 33% 3% Natural Anthropogenic 18% 8% Europe Asia North America Africa Oceans South. Hem.

Pollution of remote regions Hg deposition in the Arctic Total annual Hg deposition in the Northern Hemisphere Total Hg deposition, t/y 1 8 6 4 2 22% 33% 1% 4% Natural Anthropogenic 24% 7% Europe Asia North America Africa Oceans South. Hem.

Model evaluation Sensitivity analysis Evaluation vs. measurements Models-to-model intercomparison

Sensitivity analysis (regional) GEM concentration Boundary (GEM) Anthrop. emission Emission speciation Natural and re-emission Cloud water ph Oxidation by O3 (gas) Wet deposition Dry deposition Cloud LWC Henry's constant Hg Oxidation by O3 ( Upper boundary Oxidation by OH (gas) Dry deposition (fo Dry deposition (GEM) Aerosol solubility..2.4.6.8 1. Sensitivity coefficient Hg total deposition Boundary (GEM) Anthrop. emission Emission speciation Natural and re-emission Cloud water ph Oxidation by O3 (gas) Wet deposition Dry deposition Cloud LWC Henry's constant Hg Oxidation by O3 ( Boundary (TPM) Oxidation by OH (gas) Dry deposition (fo Dry deposition (GEM) Aerosol solubility..2.4.6.8 1. Sensitivity coefficient

Sensitivity analysis (regional) Uncertainty of input parameters Input parameters ε x Anthropogenic emissions 5% Speciation of anthropogenic emission 4% Natural emission and re-emission 9% Wet deposition coefficient Dry deposition velocity Boundary concentration GEM 75% 75% 2% Eddy diffusion coefficient 5% Liquid water content Oxidation rate by O 3 5% 5% Oxidation rate by OH 75% Oxidation rate by Cl 2 9% Reduction rate in aqueous phase 5% Hg ion-chloride equilibrium constant 5% Solution-adsorption equilibrium constant 5% ph of cloud water 2% Chloride ion concentration 9% Aerosol solubility 5% Uncertainty, % 1 8 6 4 2 Estimated model uncertainty Conc in air Conc in prec Total depos

Evaluation vs. measurements Spatial variation (annual mean values) TGM concentration 2 Hg wet deposition 3. - air concentrations -wet deposition flux Model, ng/m 3 2. 1. +3% -3% C mod =.88 C obs R corr =.94.. 1. 2. 3. Model, g/km 2 /y 15 1 5 +5% -5% F mod = 1.13 F obs R corr =.51 5 1 15 2 Observed, ng/m 3 Observed, g/km 2 /y Measurement data on Hg part and RGM concentrations and Hg dry deposition is required

Evaluation vs. measurements Long-term trends (199-23) Lista 4 3 2 Lista (NO99) Hg concentration in precipitation, ng/l Model Observed 1 ` De Zilk 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 5 4 De Zilk (NL91) Hg concentration in precipitation, ng/l Model Observed Monthly statistics NO99 NL91 Correlation.48.53 Bias -9% -1% 3 2 1 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 ` 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23

Hg models intercomparison EMEP intercomparison study for Hg models Stage I. Stage II. Stage III. Comparison of chemical modules Comparison with short-term field measurements Comparison of long-term results and atmospheric budgets Model Institution Country EMAP Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology Bulgaria GRAHM Environment Canada Canada ADOM GKSS-Forschungszentrum Germany CMAQ US EPA USA DEHM Environmental Research Institute Denmark HYSPLIT NOAA USA CAM Swedish Environmental Research Institute Sweden MCM Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. USA MSCE-HM EMEP MSCE-HM-Hem EMEP

Hg models intercomparison Stage III. Comparison of long-term modelling results Location of monitoring sites Intercomparison of Hg dry deposition Dry deposition, g/km 2 /mn 1.5 1..5 August, 1999. DE1 DE9 NL91 NO99 SE2 SE11 SE12 SE5 FI96 ADOM CMAQ DEHM EMAP GRAHM HYSPLIT MSCE-HM MSCE-HM-Hem

Hg models intercomparison Stage III. Comparison of long-term modelling results Atmospheric budget of Hg deposition to Poland Total deposition, kg/mn 12 1 8 6 4 2 August 1999 ADOM EMAP MSCE- HM MSCE- HM-Hem HYSPLIT DEHM National Global European European+global

Conclusions Current understanding of Hg atmospheric processes is incomplete and requires further research In spite of significant uncertainties, available Hg models reflect general Hg atmospheric cycle and can be used for evaluation of the intercontinental transport Model predictions show that the intercontinental transport significantly contribute to Hg depositions (4% in Europe and 7% in North America) Evaluation of the model uncertainty can include sensitivity analysis, comparison with long-term measurements and model intercomparisons

Further research Development of global Hg emission inventories from anthropogenic (speciation) and natural sources Refinement of Hg atmospheric chemistry (reaction constants, products etc.) Monitoring of Hg species (Hg part, RGM) and dry deposition fluxes Extension of the Hg models intercomparison activities to the hemispheric scale Application of multi-compartment modelling for evaluation of Hg cycling on hemispheric/global scale